Archive for the ‘Programming’ Category

For the longest time, I have been trying to get away from M$ products and my dependence upon them.  My blog, however, continues to generate a majority of its hits from just a few very specific articles on Microsoft SharePoint.  It seems that I will have to do a lot more blogging to steer myself away from this unwanted association!


Read Full Post »

I just downloaded the latest version of the Castle MonoRail assemblies.  For a while, I have been wary of using the Scaffolding for controller and View because the views seem to stumble over nullable data types in the Model classes.  While that seem to still be a problem (maybe I’ll write a patch for it), I have started to use Scaffolding for the controllers and the customizing the Views.

Here are a list of the parameters available in the PropertyBag along with the names of the files you should create.  I’m using NVelocity, so my views end with the .VM extension.

List View

View Name: List.vm
$Items : a listing of all the records for the given model

New View

This is the view that collects information for a new record.  The form action should point to the Create controller action.

View Name: new{classname}.vm  (e.g.: if you have a model called Study, your view name will be newStudy.vm)
${classname} : is the item that you’re editing.

When creating for elements, you should name them with the format name=”classname.propertyname” (e.g.: for the Study model, if I have a property called Name, then I should add a form element with the name “Study.Name”.

Create View

There is none… this controller action just redirects to the list view after the new record is created.

Edit View

View Name: edit.vm
Query String:
id : the primary key of the record (I’m not sure what happens with models using composite keys)
The form elements have the same name format as the Create view, which is name=”classname.propertyname”.

[I’m still working to gather information on the child collection properties and the available options for those collections]

Confirm View

This is the delete confirmation view.  I usually use the JavaScript ‘confirm’ method and the do a redirect to the delete action.

View Name: confirm.vm
$classname : the record to delete
id: the primary key of the record to delete.

Remove View

There is no view for this action.  The controller just redirects to the list view.

Read Full Post »

Over the past few months, I have been designing a system which integrates with a number of database servers (7 within a single application) across several different schema types (3 in a single application).  I have also started to see the value in writing good unit tests as connecting to a live database usually cannot give you the correct data for a good test.

The Object Mother Design Pattern

I have found that using the Object Mother design pattern to create the model objects that I use inside a test has decrease the number of lines I have to write for a realistic unit test.  Essentially, the object mother is a class with several static functions used to create object.  Using this class to create your objects means that the code inside you unit test function can focus on the actual testing.  Martin Fowler has a good overview of the Object Mother Design Pattern and Peter Schuh and Stephanie Punke have also written a nice paper on the pattern as well.

Person Class UML

Person Class

Person Mother Class

You can then use the PersonMother class like so:

Person newPerson = PersonMother.Create();newPerson.FirstName = "John";newPerson.LastName = "Doe";newPerson.Save();

This is all fine and good, but what if you need to customize your object once you’re object mother has returned the object to you?  Maybe we want to automatically set the person’s name to “John Doe” in our create method, but what if we want to add some children?  What if in some cases, we don’t want to have the returned Person object to have any Children in the collection.  Then you’re back to having a complex unit test again where more lines (and screen real estate)  is dedicated to the object rather than the test.

Note that if your domain model is such that a few more static methods on the Mother class will do, then you’re probably fine with the basic ObjectMother pattern.  However, if your domain model is complex and you need to test any number of model permutations very easily, then method chaining may help.

Enter the Object Mother with Method Chaining

The concept here is to create a single method in the Object Mother called Create() which takes no parameters and returns a valid instance of the Object Mother Class.  This means that if the object is persisted to the database right after the object mother returns, the database shouldn’t throw any validation errors.

BaseMother Generic Class

The concrete Object Mother class then has a series of methods which return an instance of the Object Mother.

In this way, methods can be executed in a chained manner, reducing the number of lines used to create and customize the object.  An added benefit is that dependent objects can be assembled by another Object Mother class and the passed into a method on the parent object’s mother class.

PersonMother Class with Method Chaining. The Create method is static here.

Using .Net generics, we can create a base Object Mother class which can make the implementation of concrete Object Mother Classes much easier.

Person newPerson = PersonMother.Create()    .SetName("John")    .AddChild(PersonMother.Create().SetName("Johnny").Value))    .Value;newPerson.Save();

Note that all that code can be on one line.  I’ve just expanded it to make it easier to read in this format.

In my most recent project, I have been using ActiveRecord as my ORM.  I created a subclassed ObjectMother class, allowing me to perform database operations as part of the method chain.  This is especially useful when object persistence has to occur is a certain order (of courses, defining a proper cascade within the BelongsTo attribute can also help with this… this is just an example).

ARBaseMother Class with Method Chaining

I have a few other methods on the ARBaseMother to help with my ActiveRecord testing.

Person Mother AR Class with Method Chaining

Now, the example again:

Person newPerson = PersonMother.Create()    .SetName("John")    .AddChild(PersonMother.Create().SetName("Johnny").Save().Value)    .Save()    .Value;newPerson.Save();

I have found that this pattern makes writing unit tests much easier… which means that I might actually write more of them!

Do you have an pattern which help you write tests?  Please share them in the comments below.

Read Full Post »

Wow, it has been a really long time since I last posted on this blog.  Surprisingly, I’m still getting quite a few hits on a number of blog posts, though.

Here’s a quick update on what’s going on with me:

My wife and I have a new addition to our family!  Woohoo!  That’s probably one of the big reasons I haven’t really been paying much attention to this blog lately.  Our daughter, Fiona, is a wonderful little girl.  She’s spunky like her mom… which is going to be trouble sooner or later!

Professionally, I’ve shifted gears a little bit in the last 9 months.  I’m no longer focusing on SharePoint, but am now working with a few well-known open source projects.  Among them are MonoRail and ActiveRecord from Castle Project.  Working with ActiveRecord means that I’m now using NHibernate as an object-relational model.  I’ve been using NVelocity for web site templating, Scriptaculous for animations and PrototypeJS because it’s incredibly useful.  I’m back to using TestDriven.net for unit testing, CruiseControl for continuous build integration, and NAnt for build scripts and other automated functionality.

Hopefully, I’ll start blogging about some of these technologies I’ve been using.  If nothing else, posts can serve to remind me of trouble spots I’ve run into and how I fixed certain problems.

Peace and Blessings to you!

Read Full Post »

Here’s another provisioning gotcha. I had some problems provisioning a site column which pointed to a list I was also provisioning through a feature. Below are some code examples of how I implemented a quick solution.


Read Full Post »

I’ve seen a number of posts about connecting web parts within site definition, but most of them are either confusing or totall outdated.  I ran into the problem of connecting web parts which are provisioned through a site definition (or feature) while working on a client project.


Read Full Post »

I just finished reading Getting Real, a book/PDF/article by the folks over at 37signals.com.  I know their ideas aren’t anything new, but it was refreshing to read material that seemed to agree with the things I think about software development processes.  For example:

  • You should like the piece of software you’re writing, it’s not just a handy side-effect.  If you don’t like what you’re doing, then you’ll write crappy code.  Sure, there are reasons to sit in a situation like that for a little while (family, financial, time, etc.), but why consign yourself to that forever?
  • Write less but better code.
  • Small companies (think 3-10 people) are much more agile than conglomerates.  A small company can release a web application easier than a large company in many cases.
  • An application with fewer features will usually work and feel better to the user.
  • Get your web application out sooner than later… see bullets 2 and 4.

The book really reminded me of the house church mentality applied to software development… it made me feel like I could actually start a company with a few friends and have a fighting chance without succumbing to VCs.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »